血色的清晨解析

4.29血色清晨
没时间多写。看完心情还是很沉重的。最后的慢镜头暴力场面非常震撼。前面村民吞吞吐吐知道他们各自都在隐瞒着什么 ，而到 了最后从头演起的谋杀才知道每个人都在无形中当了帮凶。虽然这个改编于马尔克斯《一场事先张扬的谋杀》的故事背景安在了一个偏僻落后的村落，看似村民蒙昧。其实这个故事换一地方又有多大区别呢，如放到某大城市的社区就 会有改观吗，这是人性的问题。而这里蒙昧的背景当了最好的代言人。
这个电影深度很够，除了原著中揭露的惊心的冷漠算计等 （其实本片已经做了不少美化

the main character in this movie is a teacher.
my father was a teacher,too.
I really do not understand why he was so much interested in English,besides I was interested in this language when I was very young because of his influence.
he once told me he and his classmate run to follow foreigners just for practice their oral English.
in my opinion,they are so much concern for to change their fate,so they choose English.

看到一半发现是改编自《一件事先张扬的谋杀案》，有被震惊到，因为情节太中国了。
时代可悲——
查案询问村民，村民却在反映自家女儿生了双胞胎只能上一个户口；
明光和红杏根本什么都没发生，但证明不了，更没人知道处女膜不是膜；
杀人宣扬得全村皆知，村民们也未当真尽力阻止，孩子递信草率也罢，可成年人们也都蜂拥而至围观杀人现场，皆是看客。
女性可怜——
男人把女人当工具，把女人当交易（他娶她妹妹、他娶她姐姐），他们用“完完整整”来形容一个女人，用“婊子”来形容初次性生活没流血的女人

It's impossible to imagine a worse film. The film gets everything wrong, from directing, acting, editing, to production design. It's hard to find out what's happening in the film and what the film is trying to express. The director knows nothing about storytelling, and the actors are just amateurs. Besides, the editing is shitty, and the production design is awful.
All in all, the rating for this movie is simply 0/10.

1992年，【转】《血色清晨》：颓坏的仪式与文化的两难（戴锦华）
转载请注明网址: https://www.aijuqing.cn/show/vod-16807.html